I write from my own work, research, and experience. AI may help with ideation, research, outlining, drafting, or editing. I take responsibility for every claim I publish, the evidence supporting it, and my interpretation of that evidence.
Before publication, I review the article myself and check its factual claims. I support technical and research claims with outside sources I have read myself. For a cited paper, that includes examining the methods, results, and limitations relevant to the claim. I use AI summaries to find material to investigate; I still do that investigation and decide what the source supports.
I distinguish what a source establishes from conclusions I draw from it. When the evidence leaves a question unresolved, I say so. Follow-up research is part of checking an interpretation, especially when another source or a reader gives me reason to doubt it.
Accounts of my work must describe things I actually did or observed. Where possible, I provide code, records, or reproducible results that readers can inspect. I label hypothetical examples and proposed designs, and distinguish them from completed work and measured results. An illustration can explain my reasoning; it cannot serve as evidence of experience I haven’t had.
Accuracy determines what I am willing to publish. I check claims as an article develops and review them again before publication. AI has helped draft and edit the articles and service pages on this site. Every page links to this policy from its footer.
If I discover an error, I correct it and add a dated note when the correction changes a claim or conclusion. Publication dates record when articles first go live. Substantive revisions receive an update date.
If you find an unsupported claim, a misleading interpretation, or an error, contact me on LinkedIn with the passage and any relevant evidence. I will investigate and update the article when a correction is warranted.
AI assisted with drafting and editing this policy.