I write from my own work and experience. AI helps with ideation, research, outlining, drafting, or editing. It has helped draft and edit the pages on this site, and every page links to this policy from its footer. I take responsibility for every claim I publish.
I check claims as an article develops. Before publication, I review the article myself and check its factual claims again. I support technical and research claims with outside sources I have read myself. For a cited paper, that includes examining the methods, results, and limitations relevant to the claim. I use AI summaries to find material to investigate; I still do that investigation and decide what the source supports. An assistant runs some of the tests and rechecks at my direction.
I distinguish what a source establishes from conclusions I draw from it. When the evidence leaves a question unresolved, I say so. Follow-up research is part of checking an interpretation, especially when another source or a reader gives me reason to doubt it.
Accounts of my work must describe things I actually did or observed. Where possible, I provide code, records, or reproducible results that readers can inspect. I label hypothetical examples and proposed designs, and distinguish them from completed work and measured results.
If I discover an error, I correct it and add a dated note when the correction changes a claim or conclusion. Publication dates record when articles first go live. Substantive revisions receive an update date.
If you find an unsupported claim, a misleading interpretation, or an error, contact me on LinkedIn with the passage and any relevant evidence. I will investigate and update the article when a correction is warranted.
AI assisted with drafting and editing this policy.